Laurea magistrale in Ingegneria e scienze informatiche
Algorithms (2009/2010)
| Course code |
4S02709 |
| Credits |
12 |
| Coordinator |
Roberto Posenato
|
| Other available courses |
Specialized degree in Computer Science Specialized degree in Intelligent and Multimedia Systems |
Teaching is organised as follows:
Educational objectives
Module: ALGORITMI AVANZATI
-------
The goal of this course is to introduce some advanced paradigms for algorithms development and analysis in order to determine good approximate solutions for hard optimization problems.
Module: COMPLESSITÀ
-------
The goal of this module is to introduce students to computational complexity theory in general, to the NP-completeness theory in detail and to computational analysis of problems with respect to their approximability.
Module: INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE
-------
The class presents the main techniques for problem solving, based on the central paradigm of symbolic representation. The objective is to provide the students with the ability to design, apply and evaluate algorithms for difficult problems, meaning that their mechanical solution captures aspects of artificial intelligence or computational rationality.
Syllabus
Module: ALGORITMI AVANZATI
-------
Main concepts recall about computational problems: definition, instances, encoding, precise and approximate models. Optimization computational problem.
Main concepts recall about algorithms: computational resources, input encoding, input size/cost, computational time. Worst and average analysis. Computational time and growth order.
Computational time vs. hardware improvements: main relations. Efficient algorithms and tractable problems.
Divide et impera paradigm
Definition and application to some problems.
Greedy paradigm
Definition and application to some problems. Matroids and greedy algorithms.
Backtracking technique
Definition and application to some problems.
Branch & Bound technique
Definition and application to some problems.
Dynamic programming paradigm
Definition and application to some problems.
Memoization and Dynamic programming.
Local search technique
Definition and application to some problems.
Approximations algorithms
Definition and some application examples.
Simulated annealing.
Tabu search.
Probabilistic algorithms
Definition and few application examples.
Numerical probabilistic algorithms, Monte Carlo algorithms and Las Vegas algorithms. Examples: Buffon's needle, Pattern Matching and Universal hashing.
Module: COMPLESSITÀ
-------
Introduction.
Computational model concept, computational resource, efficient algorithm and tractable problem.
Computational models
Turing Machine (MdT). MdT extension: multi-tape MdT (k-MdT). MdT and languages: the difference between accepting and deciding a language.
Random Access Machine (RAM) computational model. Computation time considering uniform cost criterion or logarithmic cost one.
Time Complexity
Computational class TIME(). Theorem about polynomial relation between k-MdT computations and MdT ones (sketch of proof).
Theorem about simulation cost of a MdT by a RAM.
Theorem about simulation cost of a RAM program by a MdT.
Sequential Computation Thesis and its consequences.
Linear Speed-up Theorem and its consequences.
P Computational Class.
Problems in P: PATH, MAX FLOW, PERFECT MATCHING.
Extension of MdT: non-deterministic MdT (NMdT).
Time resource for k-NMdT. NTIME() computational class. Relation between NMdT and MdT.
NP Computational Class.
An alternative characterization of NP: polynomial verifiers.
EXP Computation Class.
Space Complexity.
Space complexity concept. MdT with I/O. Computational Classes: SPACE() and NSPACE().
Compression Theorem.
Computational Classes: L and NL.
Example of problems: PALINDROME ∈ L and PATH ∈ NL.
Theorems about relations between space and time for a MdT with I/O. Relations between complexity classes.
Proper function concept and example of proper functions.
Borodin Gap Theorem.
Reachability method.
Theorem about space-time classes: NTIME(f(n)) ⊆ SPACE(f(n)), NSPACE(f(n)) ⊆ TIME(k(log n+f(n))).
Universal MdT. The Hf set. Lemma 1 and 2 for time hierarchy theorem.
Time Hierarchy Theorem: strict and no-strict versions. P ⊂ EXP Corollary.
Space Hierarchy Theorem. L ⊂ PSPACE Corollary. Savitch Theorem. SPACE(f(n))=SPACE(f(n)^2) corollary. PSPACE=NPSPACE Corollary.
Reductions and completeness.
Reduction concept and logarithmic space reduction.
HAMILTON PATH ≤log SAT, PATH ≤log CIRCUIT VALUE, CIRCUIT SAT ≤log SAT.
Language completeness concept.
Closure concept with respect to reduction. Class reduction of L, NL, P, NP, PSPACE and EXP.
Computation Table concept.
Theorem about P-completeness of CIRCUIT VALUE problem.
Cook Theorem: an alternative proof.
Gadget concept and completeness proof of: INDEPENDENT SET, CLIQUE, VERTEX COVER and others.
Module: INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE
-------
Problem solving as search in a state space; un-informed search procedures; informed search procedures and heuristic search. Constraint problem solving. Knowledge representation: use of propositional logic and first-order logic; normal forms; equality. Algorithms for satisfiability (SAT). Theorem proving: resolution and rewriting.
Exam methods
Module: ALGORITMI AVANZATI
-------
The examination consists of a written test (at the same time as the other two module tests) that lasts 1 hour (all tests together last 3 hours). The grade in this module is worth 1/3 of the grade in the Algorithms examination.
Module: COMPLESSITÀ
-------
The examination consists of a written test (at the same time as the other two module tests) that lasts 1 hour (all tests together last 3 hours). The grade in this module is worth 1/3 of the grade in the Algorithms examination.
Module: INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE
-------
The grade in Artificial Intelligence is worth 1/3 of the grade in the Algorithms exam, and it is determined by the grade in a written test.
| Statistics |
| Outcomes Exams |
Outcomes Percentages |
Average |
Standard Deviation |
| Passed |
29.82%
|
22
|
3
|
| Failed |
9.64%
|
|
| Absent |
42.10%
|
| Withdrawn |
0.87%
|
| Canceled |
17.54%
|
| Distribuzione degli esiti positivi |
| 18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
30 e Lode |
|
11.7%
|
8.8%
|
5.8%
|
8.8%
|
20.5%
|
14.7%
|
2.9%
|
5.8%
|
5.8%
|
5.8%
|
2.9%
|
0.0%
|
2.9%
|
2.9%
|
Data from AA 2009/2010 based on 114 students. I valori in percentuale sono arrotondati al numero intero più vicino.
|